The Occupy Wall Street protest movement has raised serious questions about the role of capitalist institutions,particularly corporations in American society.Well before the first protester set foot in Zucotti Park,a heckler(擾亂分子) urged Mitt Romney to tax corporations rather than people.Romney's response-- "Corporations are people" stirred a brief but intense controversy.Now thousands of demonstrators have in effect joined the heckler,denouncing(抨擊) corporations as "enemies of the people."
Far more important than questions about what corporations are is the question of what attitude we should have toward them.Should we,as corporate public relations statements often suggest,think of them as friends (if we buy and are satisfied with their products) or as family (if we work for them)?Does it make sense to be loyal to a corporation as either a customer or as an employee?More generally,even granted that corporations are not fully persons in the way that individuals are,do they have some important moral standing in our society?
My answer to all these questions is no,because corporations have no core dedication to fundamental human values.Such corporations exist as instruments of profit for their shareholders.In fact,left to themselves,they can be serious threats to human values that conflict with the goal of corporate profit.Corporations are a particular threat to truth,a value essential in a democracy,which places a premium on the informed decisions of individual citizens.The corporate threat is most apparent in advertising,which explicitly aims at convincing us to prefer a product regardless of its actual merit.Their defining goal is to generate profit.There are cases when telling the truth is the best means to advance corporate profits.In 1982,when seven people in Chicago died from poisoned Tylenol,Johnson & Johnson appealed to its credo,which makes concern for its customers primary corporate goal,and told the entire truth about what had happened.This honesty turned a potential public-relations disaster into a triumph.But Johnson & Johnson's impressive corporate credo ends by saying, "Our final responsibility is to our stockholders and must make solid profit.The credo is unclear about what happens when there is a conflict between responsible action and long-term profit.
None of this means that corporations are evil or that socialism should replace the free-enterprise system.As Michel Foucault said of all power structures,it's not that corporations are bad but that they are dangerous.The self-serving corporate speech that fills our media and halls of government is particularly dangerous for our democracy.At least for this reason,the Occupy Wall Street protesters are right to distrust corporations.
(1)Mitt Romney most probably believes thatBB.
A.individuals should pay more taxes than corporations
B.corporations should not be forced to pay more taxes
C.people should care more about corporations' development
D.corporations should enjoy all the legal rights as people do
(2)According to Paragraphs 2 and 3,it can be inferred that corporationsCC.
A.should be set as moral examples of the society
B.take employees' faithfulness as part of their goals
C.contribute little to the most essential human values
D.a(chǎn)re actually means by which people share profits
(3)The 1982 event is cited in Paragraph 3 to illustrate thatCC.
A.corporations always make profits at the expense of people's health
B.customers should always keep an eye on the quality of any product
C.corporations take economic profit as their priority essentially
D.corporation profit is always in contradiction with customer interests
(4)Which of the following is the best title for the text?AA
A.Corporations,People and Truth
B.Corporations Are Different from People
C.Corporations Are Untrustworthy
D.The Occupy Wall Street Protest
【答案】B;C;C;A
【解答】
【點(diǎn)評(píng)】
聲明:本試題解析著作權(quán)屬菁優(yōu)網(wǎng)所有,未經(jīng)書面同意,不得復(fù)制發(fā)布。
發(fā)布:2024/5/27 14:0:0組卷:5引用:2難度:0.7
相似題
-
1.British children's writer Roald Dahl ate chocolates and sweets "pretty much every mealtime",remembers daughter Ophelia Dahl.
After dinner,whether dining alone or entertaining guests,Dahl would pass around a little red plastic box full of Mars Bars,Milky Ways,Maltesers,Kit Kats and much more.
He knew the history of all the sweets and could tell you exactly when they were invented.1937 was a big year when Kit Kats (his favorite),Rolos and Smarties (his dog,chopper's favorite) were invented.He wrote a history of chocolate,lecturing schoolchildren to commit such dates to memory(熟記),such as 1928 when "Cadbury's Fruit and Nut Bar popped up on the scene",saying. "Don't bother with the Kings and Queens of England.All of you should learn these dates instead.Perhaps the Headmistress(女校長)will see from now on that it becomes part of the major teaching in this school."
According to Dahl,the Golden Years of Chocolate were 1930-1937.In 1930,Roald Dahl was 14 years old.He was a student at Repton,a famous boys' boarding school in England.It was a tough environment:those in authority were more interested in controlling than educating the students.
Ironically(諷刺地),it was at this difficult period that chocolate became Dahl's passion.Near Repton was a Cadbury chocolate factory.Every so often,Cadbury would send each schoolboy a sampler(樣品)box of new chocolates to taste and grade.They were using the students---"the greatest chocolate bar experts in the world to test out their new inventions.
This was when Dahl's imagination took flight.He pictured factories with inventing rooms with pots of chocolate and fudge(軟糖)and "all sorts of other delicious fillings bubbling away on the stoves".
"It was lovely dreaming those dreams…when I was looking for a plot for my second book for children.I remembered those little cardboard boxes(紙盒)and the newly invented chocolates inside them,and I began to write a book called Charlie and the Chocolate Factory."
For the record,Roald Dahl did not like chocolate cake or chocolate ice cream.He said, "I prefer my chocolate straight."
(1)What's the purpose of the first paragraph?
A.To introduce the main topic---Roald Dahl.
B.To introduce Dahl's love for chocolate.
C.To introduce main character's daily life.
D.To introduce some important characters.
(2)What can we infer from the passage about Roald Dahl?
A.He treated himself with various chocolate after dinner secretly.
B.He has a good knowledge of chocolate,especially its history.
C.He used to lecture schoolchildren of a boys' boarding school.
D.He only wrote some books related to the history of chocolate.
(3)What happened during the Golden Years of Chocolate?
A.It was a great time for children to get educated.
B.Those years stopped Dahl's interest in chocolate.
C.Students could become chocolate experts then.
D.Roald Dahl's passion for chocolate was lit up then.
(4)
A.the dream about chocolates.
B.Factories with chocolate and fudge.
C.Those boxes with chocolate.
D.Chocolate cakes and ice cream發(fā)布:2025/1/30 8:0:1組卷:0引用:1難度:0.5 -
2.Recently,a film star has been giving away free books on the London Underground.If you're a bookworm,a Harry Potter fan and a London Underground user,then it's been an exciting month for you.
Emma Watson,who starred in films based on the novels about a fictional schoolboy wizard,has been hiding books on the Tube for passengers to read through.
It's part of he Book On The Underground movement,which has a simple aim:to get more people burying themselves in literature.Books are left on trains for passengers to pick up,dip into and then leave for another lucky reader to skim.
The movement started in 2012 and drops off about 150 books a week in stations across London.Talking about Watson's participation in the project,the manager of Books On The Under ground,Cornelia Oxley,said, "The reaction has been great.It must be a mixture of how much everyone admires Emma,and how exciting it is to find something as wonderful as a new book on your journey."
The 100 or so books Watson left for passengers to read were even more special because she left a hand-written inscription(題詞).The books were Kaya Angelou's Mom & Me & Mom.
One person who discovered a copy of the book on the Tube said she felt like the character Charlie Bucket - a boy who finds a golden ticket to the world's greatest chocolate factory - in the Roald Dahl's classic,Charlie and the Chocolate Factory Watson became a UN Women Goodwill Ambassador in the summer of 2014 and has since started reading as many books and essays on equality and feminism(饑荒) as possible.She has also started her own book club.
So.Why not take a leaf out of Emma Watson's book and leave a copy of your favorite book on a train?It could make a stranger's life richer.
(1)What does Books On The Underground aim to do?
A.To get more readers to buy their books.
B.To leave books on trains.
C.To find lucky readers.
D.To get more people to read.
(2)Which of the following statements is NOT true?
A.People's admiration for Emma Watson contributes to the success of the movement.
B.There is a golden ticket to the world's greatest chocolate factory in the book.
C.To find something wonderful on a journey is exciting.
D.Emma Watson left hand-written inscriptions on the books.
(3)What's the author's attitude towards Emma Watson's leaving books on the train?
A.critical
B.indifferent
C.supportive
D.pessimistic發(fā)布:2025/1/30 8:0:1組卷:0引用:1難度:0.5 -
3.It can be really hard to learn a new language.I had always enjoyed learning languages in school,but only recently did I start learning German.I found that I could understand and learn individual words easily,but when it came to literature,I really struggled.That was when my tutor at university suggested reading some children's books printed in the target language.
At first,I felt a bit silly going on a hunt for a book designed for someone half my age,but then I realised that everyone has to start somewhere.As children,we are given these basic texts to familiarise our brains with certain vocabulary and writing structures,and from there,we can learn and develop.I started with books which are taught to us as children in the UK.I managed to find Oliver Twist by Charles Dickens and James and the Giant Peach by Roald Dahl.
The beauty of reading books that were introduced to you as a child is that you are already familiar with the plot.Therefore you can work out some words with your knowledge of the story.At first,I used to read with the book in one hand and a dictionary in the other,but this did not work well.The method I would recommend is to read a chapter first and at the end of that chapter,highlight the new words and then look up the definitions.If you can wait a bit before using a dictionary,you may be surprised what you can understand merely from the context.Additionally,a lot of children's books have pictures which may give you a clue as to what or to whom the passage is referring.
If you can find a translation of the books you have read as a child,I would strongly advise reading those if you are a complete beginner.However,if you feel a bit more confident reading in English,I would personally recommend the series of 'Harry Potter' books by J.K.Rowling or any of the Roald Dahl children's books.
(1)What makes it hard for the author to learn German?
A.The author had a poor memory.
B.The author had no interest in it.
C.The author had no one to ask for help.
D.The author couldn't read books fluently.
(2)What did the author think of reading children's books in the target language at first?
A.Interesting.
B.Stupid.
C.Helpful.
D.Boring.
(3)What does the author try to express mainly in Paragraph 3?
A.How to deal with new words while reading.
B.Why it is helpful to read children's book at first.
C.How to choose a proper book to match your level.
D.How to form the habit of reading in the target language.
(4)Why does the author write this text?
A.To give tips on how to learn a new language.
B.To persuade the readers to learn a new language.
C.To stress the importance of reading in language learning.
D.To share the author's stories of learning a new language.發(fā)布:2025/1/30 8:0:1組卷:5引用:1難度:0.5